Chances for shadow nerfs and buffs in the time between launch, into the TBC beta, into TBC is always an enjoyable possibility. One could only dream though as the trinket was popular in the TBC beta and in direct competition to Romulas poison vial. Would love a reliable post from somewhere between 2005-3 to 2006-12 stating number of hits/misses/crits combined with number of procs+crits & missed/resisted procs and whatnot that is connected to the recount/recap addons. The trinket is great on certain encounter(s) PVE-wise. What type of gear did these players use? About the same that will be available on Nostalrius when BWL has been released. However, considering most players used recap and other programs with rounded up/down numbers to the closest integer, there's a strong possibility that the overall damage representation ranged from 3 to 3.499%.
m#comments spottedtauren on 0 (Patch 1.12.1) One states 5% procrate, another states 2,5%, a clueless player states 25% more damage, 3% of the total overall damage is identified from two different authors. item=19289 "it procs often and does good amount of damage for the level however I would not bother using it in a dungeons because it will constantly pull enemies off the tank.". He wrote: "Tested the proc rate with 3520 hits/crits: was exactly 2,5% of chance on hit with draconic maul (3,5 speed)" ".
" " according to Arthenix on thottbots maelstorm comments the procrate is 2,5%. Mr Suitcase" "This card has replaced my Blackhand trinket as the damage it does imo is better then the 2% crit in pvp, (I always have PvP trinket equipped in BG's) The Trinket has done 3% of my overall damage and can proc 2-3 times per mob or not at all its a fickle thing, But the Damage it does is nice and I would recommend getting one for anyone. Probably be even more of an impact on him. When my Rogue gets to lvl 60, I will be acquiring the cards/buying another elementals deck. My metered DPS has gone up about 25% since. After having it for a week, WORTH EVERY PENNY. Gave up my Epic mount savings for it and paid 1200 G. Hope this is some of the information you're looking for." "Just bought this for my Warrior. All in all with the card equipped about 3% of my total damage comes from the card's proc. The druid I've been testing it with had about 50 nature resistance and resisted 25% - 50% of the lightning damage. The damage the proc does is reduced by nature resistance. With a 1.8 speed dagger it procs about once in 30 hits. With a 2,7 speed sword it procs about once in 20 hits. The procrate depends on the weapon speed. " "The card seems to proc only on hits of the mainhand weapon including specials. I have both Heroism and Maelstrom, I'm happy with both right now. Is it reasonable for such a trinket to represent such value considering the time it was implemented into the game? Let's look at some other conflicting messages: "Proc's in Shaman Ghost Wolf. did=368615 If you look at old web archives it's more questionable what the procrate really is, especially considering 1-3DPS represents 3 to 8agility. It is useful as a damage trinket in high-end raids, in PvP and PvE solo. Depending on weapon speed, it can add between 1 to 3 DPS (and sometimes higher), on average.
It is known to crit and may be effected by +spell damage(hits over 300 have occurred on non-vunerable targets), and can be resisted normally as nature damage, it can also hit for 1000-1400 when the target is vulnerable to nature, in BWL for example.
#Maelstrom dagger build free#
If you go by old wowwiki yes: "This trinket has about 1.5% proc chance, and it procs from every melee strike, including feral attacks (making this very useful for feral Druids) and free strikes. *if the chance is higher it is a bug and should be reported and fixed. With that proc chance the trinket is worse than either BB or HoJ. The trinket should* have a proc chance of 1.5%. Solmyr wrote:I'll make it simple for you.
0 kommentar(er)
